• HOME
  • case list
  • OVERVIEW
  • EVIDENCE
  • SETTLEMENT
  • PRIVACY
  • BIO

— case info —



Case No. 658931
City of Seattle vs Shane Lozenich



Arrested: 03/07/2021 | Released: 03/08/2021

Judge: Catherine Mcdowall Charges: Violation Of No Contact Order (Dv)- No Complaint Filed​



SUMMARY



I had been renting a room in a single-family home owned by a high school orchestra teacher who worked north of Seattle. I lived there for nearly three years under a rental agreement. When COVID shut down the schools, my roommate began teaching music classes from home — and that shift completely changed his demeanor. As the months of lockdown dragged on, our relationship deteriorated. The constant proximity and isolation led to arguments that grew increasingly aggressive and controlling. To avoid confrontation, I tried to keep my distance, but that only seemed to make things worse.


Around the same time, the State Auditor’s Office suffered a data breach that exposed the personal information of many people receiving pandemic assistance — myself included. I was contacted by the Auditor’s Office about the breach, but before I knew anything about it, I had already started having trouble accessing my email account and Google Drive. Then I began receiving strange messages through social media and text — messages from people I didn’t know claiming they were watching me, threatening to kill me, even describing in detail what I was wearing. On one occasion, someone contacted me through a friend’s profile, leading me to believe it was my friend inviting me over to his house. When I arrived, he was shocked to see me and said he had never sent the message.


Things took an even stranger turn when I started hearing voices taunting and harassing me — they sounded like my neighbors, but we’d never had any issues before, so it didn’t make sense. I usually heard them at night or when I was alone in my art studio. They threatened me, harassed me, and made bizarre comments about my family and heritage. I never saw anyone, but I could hear them clearly. It made me feel unsafe and deeply unsettled. I would shout, “Please stop,” but the harassment continued. Often I would hear a woman’s voice, similar to my neighbor’s, saying things like “It’s just my goddamn kids,” which was completely out of character for them. Over time, the voices seemed to get closer, as if they were right next to me, like wearing headphones turned up to full volume. I began experiencing severe headaches, sharp pains around my ears and jaw, disturbing vibrations, and high-frequency sounds inside my skull, along with obscene voices echoing in my inner ear.


Since the voices sounded like they were coming from the neighbors next door, I decided to go over and check in. I knocked on their door, and a man I had never seen before answered. Just behind him, I saw a woman at a nearby desk — also someone I’d never seen before. I told him I lived next door and was checking in to see if everything was alright. I didn’t explain exactly what I was hearing because I wasn’t sure where the voices were coming from. He told me everything was fine and quickly closed the door.


A few nights later, I heard a loud scream, like a young girl, quickly covered up by the sound of a blow dryer. I ran outside to see where it was coming from but saw no one — not in the front yard, the backyard, or my neighbor’s yard. The next night I decided to call the police and have them to do a wellness check. I was on the front porch of my residence when the police arrived at the house next door. They went and spoke with the people inside then came over to speak with me. I explained that I hadn’t seen my neighbors in months and wasn’t sure who the couple was now living there. The officers said there was nothing they could do and left. I even called the school the kids next door attended and left a voicemail with my contact information, but I never heard back.


Unable to find the source of the voices and feeling increasingly uneasy about the threatening messages, I began to suspect that maybe my roommate was behind it all. His behavior had grown possessive, and we were arguing almost every day. What made me especially suspicious was the fact that he had ordered unusual AV equipment — things like an electrometer, a switchboard, and other frequency devices to help him teach music classes from home. I had never used this kind of equipment before and seeing it all arrive one day made me feel a little uncomfortable about how it might be used, especially when I started to feel physical pain in and around my head, eyes and ears.


One night, I was hit with a migraine so vicious it felt like a shrieking, high-pitched frequency drilling behind my eyes. Sleep was impossible. Desperate to make it stop, I ran upstairs and found my roommate at his computer, headphones on, surrounded by his equipment. I yelled, “What are you doing?” while frantically trying to switch off dials and controls. He claimed he was just working on assignments for his classes the next day.


As time passed, I became convinced that this equipment was being misused — to spy on me, record me, maybe even harm me physically. The tension between us kept mounting until it snapped into outright abuse. He once barged into the bathroom while I was showering and bit me when I shoved him out and forced the door shut. Another day, someone he knew came over, and when I opened the front door to see who it was, they pulled a knife on me. I called the police multiple times to report the abuse, but they refused to file a report — most precincts in Seattle were shut down because of COVID social distancing.


Somehow, my roommate managed to talk to someone at the sheriff’s office and got a protection order filed against me. Meanwhile, none of my own reports ever materialized into anything official. It was infuriating and baffling — and it forced me to pay closer attention to the strange things happening around me: the missing neighbors next door, the cryptic messages, the voices I was hearing. Piece by piece, it all started to feel connected.


In the last week of February, two sheriff’s deputies came to the house, served me with paperwork, and told me I had to leave immediately. I packed what I could and stayed in a hotel for about a week, but with only a few belongings and no clear plan, I decided to return to the house, believing I still had the right to be there under my rental agreement with the owner.


On the morning of March 7th, while I was still lying in bed, two Seattle Police Department officers entered my room and arrested me for allegedly violating the no-contact order that had been issued by the King County Sheriff’s Department two weeks earlier. They pulled me from my bed and handcuffed me on the spot. I spent one night in the county jail and was released the next day. No formal complaint was ever filed against me, and the case was dismissed without prejudice.



NOTES

​

  • I called 911 twice before the protection order was filed against me to report my roommate's abusive behavior, but the police refused to make a report or look into it.
  • I never found out who the people staying next door were, nor did I get information about my neighbors whereabouts.
  • The voices continued so I contacted the Mayor, a senator and a few other departments in Seattle.​​

Court Docs
Supporting Docs

DEXTER HORTON BUILDING

710 Second Ave Suite 1000

Seattle, WA 98104 (206) 477-5814 (office)



KRIS SHAW | PUBLIC DEFENDER

kris.shaw@kingcounty.gov

(206) 305-1977 (office)



ALLISON COOPER | AST. ATTORNEY

alison.cooper@kingcounty.gov

(206) 321-7084 (cell)




Claims Related To Gangstalking & Voice To Skull Made Between 2017-2021



CLAIMS

​

​


Online TI and Gangstalking Communities

  • ​A 2017–18 survey of 746 self-identified “Targeted Individuals” found that 66% reported V2K experiences, 89% reported directed-energy weapons, and 92% reported organized stalking
  • Washington State frequently surfaced among TI respondents, alongside Colorado and national intelligence hotspots
  • Firsthand reports talk about VLF radio devices used to remotely harass targets, often via bedroom-level eavesdropping or sound projection


Local TI Narratives in Washington

  • A 2021 Reddit user claimed: “Gang Stalking is likely a disinformation term… perpetrated by secret society members, community‑based agents, federal agents and security contractors” in WA
  • In 2021, others recounted harassment patterns in Olympia, involving organized daily disturbances, noise, and mimicry—hallmarks of "gangstalking"


Local TI Context and Regional Prevalence

  • Reddit mentions WA frequently among “Targeted Individuals.” Seattle ranks high in Google Trends for “gangstalking” searches
  • A 2017 TI survey found 66% reported hearing voices (V2K), 89% reported directed-energy devices, especially in Western states like WA . Some victims in WA reported coordinated, technology-enabled harassment involving devices and helicopters .


— related media —



PUBLISHED 2020



Device-Free Human Micro-Activity Recognition Method Using WiFi Signals



Publication I came across while searching for information about electronic harassment.



PUBLISHED 2020



Engineers Design a Tiny, Implantable Chip To Deepen Understanding of the Brain and Enable Better Treatments for Neurological Disorders



Publication I came across while searching for information about electronic harassment.



PUBLISHED 2018



Government Accidentally Releases Documents on"Psycho-Electric" Weapons



Publication I came across while searching for information about electronic harassment.




PUBLISHED 2016



So You Think You’ve Been Implanted Against Your Will?



Publication I came across while searching for information about electronic harassment.




PUBLISHED 2006



Tiny Electronic Chip, Interacting With the Brain, Modifies Pathways for Controlling Movement



Publication I came across while searching for information about electronic harassment.




Surveillance, Silence, & Systemic Failure: A Case Study of Procedural Breakdown in Seattle



Journal of Legal Systems & Civil Liberties



ABSTRACT


This article examines the case of City of Seattle v. Shane Lozenich (Case No. 658931), a legal episode emblematic of broader systemic failures in law enforcement, mental health adjudication, and civil liberties during the COVID-19 pandemic. Through firsthand narrative and documented events, the case reveals troubling patterns of ignored abuse reports, questionable psychiatric interventions, and the misuse of protective orders. The analysis explores how technological surveillance, institutional bias, and procedural inconsistencies can converge to undermine justice and due process.



LEGAL ISSUES RAISED



Due Process Violations:

  • Arrest without formal complaint
  • Dismissal without trial or evidentiary hearing
  • Repeated psychiatric holds without clear justification

Failure to Investigate Abuse Claims:

  • Multiple 911 calls reporting assault and threats were not documented
  • No police reports filed despite allegations of physical violence and threats with a weapon

Questionable Use of Protective Orders:

  • Protection order filed by alleged abuser
  • Defendant’s reports of abuse were not acknowledged or acted upon

Technological Harassment Allegations:

  • Claims of invasive surveillance and auditory harassment
  • Suspected misuse of AV equipment and digital intrusion


COURT'S REASONING & PROCEDURAL NOTES


The court did not issue a formal opinion due to the absence of a filed complaint. However, the procedural handling raises concerns about:

  • The threshold for issuing and enforcing protective orders
  • The role of law enforcement discretion during pandemic-related shutdowns
  • The lack of continuity in legal representation and mental health evaluations


COMMENTARY & IMPLICATIONS



1. Pandemic-Era Legal Gaps

  • The COVID-19 pandemic created unprecedented disruptions in judicial and law enforcement operations. In this case, the closure of precincts and limited court access contributed to a breakdown in accountability and response


2. Mental Health and Competency Bias

  • The repeated questioning of the defendant’s mental competency—without thorough investigation of the underlying claims—reflects a troubling trend where psychiatric labeling can be used to dismiss or delegitimize allegations of abuse or surveillance.


3. Surveillance and Privacy Concerns

  • The allegations of auditory harassment, digital intrusion, and physical symptoms linked to AV equipment raise urgent questions about the legal boundaries of surveillance technology in domestic settings.
  • These claims warrant further forensic investigation and legal scrutiny.


4. Legal Recourse and Reform

This case underscores the need for:

  • Stronger oversight of protective order issuance
  • Mandatory investigation of abuse claims regardless of pandemic conditions
  • Legal protections against technological harassment
  • Mental health evaluations that prioritize evidence over assumption


CONCLUSION


The case of City of Seattle v. Shane Lozenich is not merely a dismissed charge—it is a window into the fragility of legal protections when systems fail to respond to complex, intersecting threats. It calls for renewed attention to procedural justice, technological accountability, and the rights of individuals navigating both legal and psychological trauma.



— CONTACT ME —




Shane J Lozenich | Seattle, WA 98104



​thefacts.today





COPYRIGHT © 2025 BY JONATHAN SHANE CONCEPTS