• HOME
  • case list
  • OVERVIEW
  • EVIDENCE
  • SETTLEMENT
  • PRIVACY
  • BIO

— CASE INFO —



Case No. 658959
City of Seattle vs Shane Lozenich



Arrested: 03/10/2021 | Released: 03/24/2021

Charges: Violation Of No Contact Order, Theft - Dismissed W/O Prejudice ​



SUMMARY



On the afternoon of March 10th, I walked to my former residence to check on my belongings. My former roommate had texted me the night before, asking when I planned to pick up my things. At the time, I didn’t have a place to move everything, but I wanted to see if there was anything small or important enough to take with me.


Another reason I returned was to see if the neighbor next door had come back with her kids. I knocked on her front door, then went to her side door and knocked again. A moment later, a woman opened the front door and called out my name. She sounded like my neighbor, but did not look like her. I approached her front steps and told her I was looking for a tote bag that might have been left at her house. I couldn’t think of anything else to say to explain why I had knocked. She said no such bag was there and asked if I needed one. I thanked her, declined, and asked if she had seen Toby, the homeowner. She replied, “I am Toby. I just might look a little different—I’ve gained weight and changed my hair.” I looked at her, said “okay,” apologized, and walked next door to my former residence.


When I got there, I knocked several times but no one answered. I went around to the back door, which was unlocked, knocked again, and entered. I called out my former roommate's name and heard a distant “Hello.” As usual, he was upstairs and hadn’t heard me knocking. I called up to him from the bottom of the stairs, asking if I could come up. He agreed, so I went upstairs.


We spoke briefly—small talk. He asked how I was; I asked the same. I told him I was hungry and had no money because I had just gotten out of jail a few nights earlier. He told me to check the spot where he usually kept cash. There was $40. I asked if I could borrow it, and he agreed. Shortly after, I left to get food from a nearby store while he remained at the house.


As I was returning—about a block away—three officers, one in full military camouflage, rounded the corner and approached me. They immediately placed me in handcuffs, stating I was not allowed on the property due to an active protection order. I told them I believed the order had been amended or lifted, and that I had paperwork in my pocket to prove it. One officer glanced at the document, then folded it and handed it back to me.


They had me sit on the fender of their vehicle while they searched my backpack. Meanwhile, the officer in camouflage went to speak with my former roommate on the front porch.


After the search, the officers put my backpack in their vehicle. A female officer then approached and asked how I was doing. I told her I was stressed because I thought the protection order had been dismissed when I was released from jail two days earlier. She said they were still looking into it, then asked what I liked to do in my free time. I told her I liked to read, then asked if I could tell her something that might sound strange. She said yes, so I quietly explained that I believed I was being harmed by some form of technology. I didn’t know where it was coming from, but I explained that voices were taunting and threatening me. At one point, they told me everything was being recorded and could be accessed by dialing 1-800-732-6029, then extension 302, followed by the code word “LB Daniels”—the name of a diner my great-grandparents used to take my sisters and me to as children. The officer wrote the number on the palm of her hand and walked away.


What I didn’t mention was that the night before, I had gone to the emergency room at Swedish Hospital because I was in pain and hearing voices. After triage, I was taken to a room where several medical staff were present. One doctor began examining my head with a large magnet. He moved it around and then paused, saying, “Here it is—a microchip.” I was already in pain and scared, and hearing that nearly made me break down. I asked for an X-ray or MRI to confirm it, but he refused and told me to leave.


Back on the street, after speaking with my former roommate, the officers returned and put me in their vehicle. The one in military gear stood by the curb. I still don’t know why someone in military uniform was present, but I assumed it was related to the recent Black Lives Matter protests or calls to defund the police.


As we drove away, I noticed we were heading north, away from downtown where the county jail is located. I began to panic, thinking I might be taken to a military base or camp and subjected to more harm—or worse. After several minutes, we arrived at a large fenced area that looked like a secure police vehicle lot. The gate opened, we pulled in and parked. The officer brought me into a small building. Aside from one other officer, the place was empty.


I was placed in a single holding cell for about an hour. The officer later returned, released me from the cell, and drove me to the county jail downtown. I was never told why we had stopped at that facility, and it was never mentioned again during my time in custody.


Due to COVID-related social distancing and overcrowding, I was transferred to another facility outside the city. I had court the next day—March 11th—and was surprised to learn the City of Seattle had filed charges for violating a no-contact order and theft. I didn’t believe I had violated the order, and I certainly didn’t steal the money—I had asked for it, and it had been given willingly. I also believed the temporary protection order had already been lifted by the time I was released.


Before my court appearance, I briefly met someone standing in for my assigned public defender. They seemed unaware of the details of my case. Instead of investigating the protection order, they raised the issue of competency to stand trial. The judge granted this and scheduled a competency evaluation and a hearing for March 22nd.


A few days later, a protection order was delivered to my cell dated March 10th, the same day I was arrested. This was the first time I saw it. I immediately wrote a kite (inmate message) to the release planner to get contact info for my public defender. On March 19th, someone arrived to conduct a psychiatric evaluation, but I had yet to hear from my defender, so I chose not to participate and left the room. The competency hearing originally set for March 22nd was canceled. A new hearing was held on March 24th, but I was not present. That day, the judge dismissed the charges without prejudice and ordered that I be referred to a treatment facility for evaluation.


Later that same day, I was released from jail—but immediately transferred to the hospital across the street. I was confused because I had not received any paperwork explaining this transfer from the court.


(See hospital details below.)



NOTES

​

  • The officers listed on the police report were not the officers who arrested me. The officers present were named: Williams, Harris and one other police officer then someone from the military named Heiffer (or something close to that spelling)
  • An order to redact the competency evaluation dated March 22nd was included with the court documents, which I did not receive while in jail or in the hospital. I obtained from e-services.
  • The paperwork to obtain a protection order filed by my former roommate included an email from our former neighbor, Toby. This is not something she would have done - completely out of character for her.
  • Voice to skull was (and still is) being used on me as a form of torture causing bodily harm and pain. After being released from the hospital the pain increased (see notes below)

Court Docs
Supporting Docs

DEXTER HORTON BUILDING

710 Second Ave Suite 1000 Seattle, WA 98104​

​(206) 477-5814 (office)



ELIZABETH MUSTIN | ATTORNEY

emustin@kingcounty.gov

(206) 623-2056 (office)



KRIS SHAW | LEGAL STAFF

kris.shaw@kingcounty.gov

(206) 305-1977 (cell)




Harborview Hospital Psych Hold



​Admitted: 03/24/2021 | Released: 04/15/2021

Judge: Damon Shadid Order to Release and Defer



SUMMARY



Upon my release from jail, I was informed that I would be transferred to Harborview Hospital for a 72-hour hold. However, no such order was documented in my release paperwork, and I had no medical or psychological concerns at the time. I was officially released from jail and in my street clothes but was not permitted to leave the facility.


Two officers came over and put handcuffs on me and had me follow them to a vehicle, which looked like it was used to pick up stray dogs and bring them to the pound. The back had no windows and there was hardly enough room for my legs. It was not something I had ever seen before. We left the jail and drove directly across the street to Harborview Hospital and pulled into the emergency room entrance.


When we arrived at Harborview’s emergency room, the situation was confusing and disorganized. Two officers escorted me into the building and immediately shouted toward the nearest hospital staff member, asking where they should place me. The staff member approached and began asking the officers questions—questions they were unable to answer. The hospital employee then walked us over to a computer at the nurse's station and asked me to sit in a chair beside it while he and the officers attempted to determine who had ordered the hold. I overheard the staff member mention, during a phone call, that the court contact was someone named Marianna. I did not recognize the name, but I heard the officers mutter a few words in acknowledgment as if they knew her.


Eventually, I was moved from the chair to a nearby hospital bed. It was positioned awkwardly and offered no privacy—there was no curtain or partition. Shortly afterward, several hospital staff members approached me. One nurse, in particular, was carrying a large syringe and spoke rudely. As she moved closer, the other staff surrounded the bed, forming a wall around me. Their presence felt intimidating and borderline threatening. The nurse grabbed my upper arm and wiped it with an alcohol pad. I immediately stated that I felt fine and did not want any medication. Despite this, the officers forcefully pushed me onto the bed and held my arms down. I panicked and shouted for them to stop. They insisted it was necessary to "calm me down," even though I had remained calm up to that point and exhibited no signs of distress. The nurse injected the syringe into my arm without informing me of what the substance was and without performing a medical screening.


Afterward, I lay on the bed feeling dizzy. Eventually, I was walked to a small room away from the main emergency area. It appeared to be a converted supply closet, containing only a small bed and no sink or restroom. Once inside, the door was shut and locked behind me. I was confined to the space, unable to leave, though I could move about within its limited area.


A few hours later, someone informed me that I was being moved to another floor. Soon after, a group of staff arrived with a hospital bed and asked me to climb onto it. Once I laid down, they raised the side rails and pulled out leather restraints. I immediately felt a surge of panic. They proceeded to tie both my arms to the rails. Then they rolled the bed out of the room, through the main ER floor, past other patients and hospital staff, in what felt like a public display of humiliation.


We arrived on what I believe was the 8th floor, where I was placed in a crowded room with several other patients. Each bed had curtains for partial privacy. I remained restrained as I listened to a nearby patient yelling at the staff. Eventually, a male staff member approached me and began speaking. His name badge read “Shane J,” which stood out to me since it matched my own first name and middle initial. Distracted by the coincidence, I missed much of what he said. He later returned with a portable x-ray machine and took a chest image, even though I had no respiratory symptoms, cough, or chest pain.


After the x-ray, a doctor informed me that I would moved to a medical floor and admitted as a patient because he was concerned about a dark spot found on my lung. He said an order to get an MRI was put in. Still strapped to the bed, I was taken to another floor of the hospital and placed into a private room. A nurse came in and connected an IV and handed me a small plastic urinal then released one of my arms from the restraint.


Later that evening I was taken to the MRI room and given a contrast agent through my IV, which made me nauseous and caused me to throw up. Once the scan was complete, I was returned to my room.


Later, the medical team reconnected my IV and listed a few medications—one of which was Haloperidol, Risperdal and another for leg cramps. One medication was administered via injection to my abdomen, and the other was given as a pill, if I recall correctly.


Shortly after the injection, I began experiencing severe, involuntary muscle contractions. My limbs twisted and stiffened, my neck locked, and my stomach began to spasm violently—it felt like being repeatedly punched from the inside. My speech became slurred, and I started drooling. Panic set in, making it even harder to breathe. I had no idea what was happening to me. The spasms lasted for over two hours, and the abdominal pain continued through the night.


The next day, various medical professionals came through to ask about my medical and mental health history. They ordered bloodwork, and nurses changed the IV bag regularly. At this point, I was officially admitted to the hospital as a medical patient.


Then came the test results. I was shocked to learn that I had tested positive for neurosyphilis and possibly tuberculosis, along with signs of an acute lung infection. I was confident that my vaccines were up to date, so they ran more tests and ultimately ruled out TB. The treatment plan included 500 mL of intravenous penicillin per day for seven days, along with a lumbar puncture (spinal tap).


While this may have been the appropriate treatment, I never consented to it—I had been admitted under duress and without voluntary agreement. To make matters worse, I was moved from the medical unit to a psychiatric floor midway through my treatment, which ended up being two weeks and for reasons that were never explained.



NOTES​


  • It was not until after I was released from jail and then the hospital did I find out there was an order from the court for a 72 hour hold, but I was not given the paperwork while in jail nor did I receive anything related to it while I was in the hospital.
  • The initial judgement states a triage evaluator would do an evaluation to determine the necessary treatment. I was not evaluated before being treated and admitted as a medical patient.
  • I received a letter from Apple Health, my former provider, saying I did not need to be in the hospital for treatment and to release me on April 5th. Instead, the hospital kept me on psychiatric floor until April 15th and continued the intravenous penicillin treatment. ​


IN WASHINGTON STATE & KING COUNTY

​

  • Tuberculosis (TB): King County saw a 15% increase in TB cases in 2021 compared to 2020. Seattle accounted for a significant portion (43%) of these cases. There was a notable outbreak of TB in Washington state prisons in 2021-2022, considered the state's largest in 20 years. This was attributed in part to the suspension of routine screenings during the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Syphilis: King County experienced a significant rise in syphilis cases, including congenital syphilis, with a 67% increase in congenital syphilis cases in 2023 compared to 2021. Syphilis cases increased by 49% in Washington between 2019 and 2021. Public Health - Seattle & King County formed a Syphilis Task Force to address the epidemic.

Medical Reports/Labs
Supporting Docs

HARBORVIEW HOSPITAL

325 9th Ave Main Hospital, Seattle, WA

​​(206) 744-3000 (main)



ELIZABETH MUSTIN | ATTORNEY

emustin@kingcounty.gov

(206) 623-2056 (office)



MOLLY MCNAMERA | HOSPITAL STAFF

Harborview Hospital LICSW (Unit 5WA)

mollymcn@uw.edu (206) 744-6631 (office)



Electronic Harassment/Gangstalking



STATEMENT



Prior to my arrest, I went to the emergency room at Swedish Hospital to report that I was being tortured through electronic harassment. During my visit, hospital staff used a magnet over the top of my head and told me there was a microchip implanted in my skull, then abruptly told me to leave. I still do not understand why they said this or what it meant.


Every day since, I am forced to endure relentless psychological and physical torment through what I believe to be advanced weaponry—so-called “voice-to-skull” technology or psycho-electromagnetic devices. My abusers use remote-directed signals—microwaves, plasma rays, radio frequencies—that connect directly to my skull and nervous system. These signals create constant sounds inside my head: people taunting me, reading aloud anything I read, making vile sexual remarks to destabilize me. Worse, I am forced to hear the horrifying sounds of children crying, being assaulted, and murdered—sounds so graphic and cruel that they push me toward despair.


This constant assault causes anxiety, sleeplessness, loss of concentration, and physical pain: relentless itching, stomach pain, muscle aches, and sudden sharp sensations that feel like targeted attacks. My abusers threaten me daily, urging me to kill myself. They claim they can access my thoughts, my senses—hearing what I hear and seeing what I see—wherever I am. I believe they are using this same technology to facilitate human trafficking and acts of terrorism; I have heard what sound like buses and navy ships exploding from the inside, as if I am forced to witness these horrors through sound alone.


I have reached out for help everywhere I could—government agencies, nonprofits, the United Nations, even the church—but I am either ignored or given dismissive replies. I have even been arrested for contacting officials too often and for threatening the mayor and detective out of desperation.


I fear my abusers intend to cause permanent damage or kill me outright. I believe they have used EMP-like attacks on my body, dropping my heart rate in seconds to mimic a heart attack, or targeting my brain with signals that cause my face muscles to sag and my speech to slur, as if inducing a stroke. One night while I slept, I woke to a piercing beep inside my skull and heard someone say, “This is a CSC data breach,” followed by the sensation of my chest collapsing and my body dropping weightlessly. A friend of mine was targeted at the same time; he suffered brain damage like a stroke and is now in assisted living, relearning to speak and move.


This technology is invisible, undetectable by standard medical imaging—MRIs and X-rays have shown nothing, nor did jail medical checks. But the damage and terror are real. I am terrified that if this continues, I will be permanently harmed, silenced, or killed.


The diagram below identifies areas of the body that can be affected by psycho-electromagnetic weaponry. This technology doesn’t just inflict pain — it can also result in misdiagnoses, which may explain why doctors incorrectly believed I had tuberculosis when I was in the hospital. More information about the technology can be found on my site www.techhumano.com



— RELATED MEDIA —



PUBLISHED 2021



Seattle Police Remember Officer Alexandra 'Lexi' Harris killed in Overnight Crash



This was the officer I spoke with at the time of my arrest. I told her about the voice to skull and gave her a phone number which she wrote on the inside of her hand.



PUBLISHED 2023



Tuberculosis Outbreak in a State Prison System — Washington, 2021–2022



This provides evidence that a TB outbreak occurred in 2021 but we were never informed in the county jails of this outbreak.




PUBLISHED 2021



Tuberculosis in Seattle & King County-Annual Report



2021 Annual report by public health in King County and Seattle



ON GOING



Cases Currently Under Investigation by U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Right



This is from the ​Breach Portal: Notice to the Secretary of HHS Breach of Unsecured Protected Health Information



PUBLISHED 2025



T-Mobile Sued by Washington State Over 2021 Data Breach



One of the data breaches from 2021 and may have been related to the data breach from 2020 that I was trying to get someone to look into as my information was compromised, which resulted in an arrest.



PUBLISHED 2021



Frequently Asked Questions Regarding a Data Breach at SAO’s Third-Party Service Provider



I received a letter from the auditor's office stating my personal information was compromised



PUBLISHED 2021



'Completely Unacceptable': Data Breach Compromised Info of 1.6 Million Washingtonians Who Sought Unemployment



I received a letter from the auditor's office stating my personal information was compromised​




PUBLISHED 2021



J&J Settles Most Risperdal lawsuits, with $800 Million in Expenses



This explains some of the side effects from the drug Risperdal, which was given to me in the hospital.



PHOTO



Police Parking Lot I Was Held at Before Booking at County Jail



This is the police parking lot I was taken to and held before being transferred to the county jail. It is located at N 125th St and Stone Way Ave N



Surveillance, Silence, & Systemic Failure: A Case Study of Procedural Breakdown in Seattle



Journal of Legal Systems & Civil Liberties



ABSTRACT



This article analyzes City of Seattle v. Shane Lozenich (Case No. 658959), a case involving charges of violating a no-contact order and alleged theft—both dismissed without prejudice. The events surrounding the arrest, detention, and court proceedings reveal troubling inconsistencies in legal process, mental health adjudication, and law enforcement conduct. The case raises urgent questions about the use of protective orders, the handling of competency evaluations, and the intersection of technology, privacy, and psychiatric intervention.



LEGAL ISSUES RAISED



1. Ambiguity of Protective Orders:

  • Defendant believed the order had been lifted; officers failed to verify documentation
  • Protection order dated the same day as arrest was not served until days later


2. Consent vs. Theft Allegation:

  • Defendant claims money was offered voluntarily.
  • No evidence presented of theft or coercion


3. Competency Evaluation Process:

  • Public defender raised competency without investigating facts.
  • Evaluation scheduled, canceled, and rescheduled without defendant’s participation or presence


4. Unexplained Detention Procedures:

  • Temporary stop at unknown facility prior to jail booking Presence of military personnel during arrest raises jurisdictional and procedural concerns


5. Mental Health and Technology Claims:

  • Allegations of auditory harassment and technological harm dismissed without investigation ER visit involving claim of microchip discovery not followed by diagnostic imaging



PROCEDURAL NOTES


  • Defendant was arrested after visiting former residence and neighbor’s home
  • Officers failed to confirm validity of protection order before arrest
  • Psychiatric evaluation was initiated without full legal representation
  • Charges were dismissed, but defendant was transferred to hospital without explanation or documentation


COMENTARY IMPLICATIONS


1. Protection Orders and Due Process

  • The issuance and enforcement of protection orders must be accompanied by clear communication and documentation. In this case, the defendant was unaware of the active order and had paperwork suggesting its dismissal—yet was arrested without verification.


2. Competency as a Legal Shortcut

  • The invocation of competency evaluations without thorough case review undermines the defendant’s right to a fair trial. It can serve as a procedural bypass that delays justice and stigmatizes individuals without cause.


3. Law Enforcement Transparency

  • The presence of military personnel and unexplained detours during detention raise serious questions about transparency, jurisdiction, and the militarization of civilian policing.


4. Mental Health and Technology Intersection

  • The defendant’s claims of technological harassment and auditory distress were not investigated, despite physical symptoms and corroborating details. This reflects a broader failure to engage with emerging forms of psychological and digital harm.


5. Systemic Breakdown in Representation

  • The lack of continuity in legal counsel, failure to communicate court orders, and absence of defendant at key hearings point to systemic neglect in public defense and judicial oversight.


CONCLUSION


​City of Seattle v. Shane Lozenich illustrates how procedural ambiguity, institutional bias, and technological neglect can converge to erode civil liberties. The case calls for reform in protective order enforcement, mental health adjudication, and law enforcement accountability—especially in contexts where emerging technologies and psychological distress intersect.



Surveillance, Silence, and Systemic Failure: A Case Study of Procedural Breakdown In Seattle



Journal of Legal Systems & Civil Liberties



ABSTRACT


This article examines two interconnected legal events involving Shane Lozenich: a court-ordered psychiatric hold at Harborview Hospital and a subsequent arrest for alleged violation of a court order. These incidents reveal a troubling pattern of opaque judicial decisions, involuntary medical procedures, and law enforcement actions that appear to disregard due process and personal autonomy. The analysis explores the legal and ethical implications of psychiatric detention, forced medication, and the use of competency evaluations as a procedural tool.


LEGAL ISSUES RAISED



1. Involuntary Medical Detention Without Documentation

  • No written court order presented at time of transfer to Harborview
  • Detention initiated while defendant was in street clothes and officially released from jail


2. Forced Medication and Lack of Informed Consent

  • Injection administered without explanation or screening
  • Subsequent administration of Haloperidol and Risperdal led to severe physical reactions


3. Violation of Patient Rights and Dignity

  • Public restraint and transport through hospital corridors
  • Confinement in a supply closet-like room without basic amenities


4. Ambiguity in Protection Order

  • Enforcement Arrest on May 15th based on alleged violation of a court order
  • Defendant claims the order was lifted and that the visit was prompted by the protected party


5. Competency Evaluation as Procedural Shortcut

  • Case dismissed based on redacted evaluation from March 22, 2021
  • No follow-up or referral despite “dismiss and defer” language in release order


COMENTARY IMPLICATIONS



1. Medical Ethics and Legal Oversight

  • The Harborview incident raises serious questions about the intersection of medical ethics and judicial authority. The absence of documentation, lack of consent, and use of physical restraint suggest a breakdown in oversight and accountability.


2. Competency Evaluations as Gatekeeping Mechanisms

  • Repeated use of competency evaluations—often without full legal representation or factual investigation—reflects a systemic tendency to sideline complex cases by questioning mental fitness rather than addressing substantive claims.


3. Law Enforcement and Surveillance Concerns

  • The May 15th arrest suggests potential surveillance or third-party reporting inconsistent with known facts. The defendant’s claim that the protected party invited him to retrieve mail complicates the narrative and raises concerns about selective enforcement.


4. Voice-to-Skull Allegations and Emerging Harms

  • The defendant’s repeated claims of auditory harassment and technological torture remain uninvestigated. While controversial, such allegations deserve forensic inquiry and legal consideration, especially when accompanied by physical symptoms.


5. Judicial Transparency and Procedural Reform

  • The lack of clarity around court orders, medical transfers, and dismissal language points to a need for greater transparency in judicial processes—particularly in cases involving mental health and civil liberties.


CONCLUSION


​The experiences of Shane Lozenich reflect a broader crisis in the handling of psychiatric holds, medical consent, and legal representation. These events underscore the urgent need for reform in how courts, hospitals, and law enforcement coordinate in cases involving mental health and protective orders. Without clear documentation, informed consent, and procedural integrity, the system risks becoming a mechanism of coercion rather than protection.​


CASE ANALYSIS


Involuntary Hospitalization, Procedural Irregularities, and the Boundaries of Due Process: A Case Analysis



— CONTACT ME —




Shane J Lozenich | Seattle, WA 98104



​thefacts.today





COPYRIGHT © 2025 BY JONATHAN SHANE CONCEPTS